It would be great if I could affirm that Seneca figured out the key to tranquillity. Unfortunately, this isn’t the case. He did deploy extensive efforts in this area, especially in his treatise “On the Tranquillity of the Mind,” but he failed to identify a valid formula for peace of mind.
Nonetheless, I find it useful to analyse Seneca’s prescription in this area because the analysis will bring us close to the truth. By understanding Seneca’s errors, we can gain crucial insights into the best recipes for tranquillity.
Seneca believed that, for humans, tranquillity comes from within. He decoupled peace of mind from the circumstances, risks and setbacks experienced by individuals. He affirmed that humans can remain calm and equanimous even in the face of vast disasters.
What proof did Seneca provide for his hypothesis? Only a series of anecdotes that demonstrate very little. For instance, in his treatise “On the Tranquillity of the Mind,” Seneca points out that the dictator Lucius Cornelius Sulla (138-78 BC) never found peace of mind in life, despite his enormous wealth and political power. I agree with the logic that Sulla’s inner turmoil shows that wealth and power alone don’t guarantee tranquillity.
Seneca’s formula for tranquillity
It isn’t hard to tear Seneca’s argument apart because it lacks fundamental logic. Seneca would have been right to affirm that wealth and power don’t necessarily lead to tranquillity, but the inner turmoil of Sulla does not demonstrate that wealth, power, and other practical advantages are irrelevant for tranquillity.
I am sure that Sulla would have enjoyed life much less if he had lacked wealth and power, or if he had suffered a defeat in his military campaigns.
There is no logical basis to affirm that success, prosperity and good health are irrelevant for peace of mind. Seneca’s idea of tranquillity as a purely intellectual phenomenon is clearly in conflict with everybody’s experience of life.
In his 62nd Letter to Lucilius, Seneca employs a similarly twisted logic by referring to Demetrius the Cynic. I must note that there are no records that he had personally met Demetrius.
Seneca’s argument goes as follows: Despite his poverty and lowly social position, Demetrius was a happy, fulfilled person. This proves, according to Seneca, that tranquillity is unrelated to tangible aspects such as wealth, prosperity and success.
Critique of Seneca’s prescription for tranquillity
The flaw in Seneca’s logic is fairly obvious. Demetrius may have been happy (at least by his own standards) even if he was lacking material possessions, but this does not mean that every person living in poverty will be happy.
Seneca is elevating an anecdote to a philosophical principle, but that’s not a valid method for building a solid philosophy. Instead, Seneca should have looked at the evidence that belies the anecdote. If he had done so, he would have discarded his own argument as fallacious.
The logical mistake underlying all Seneca’s arguments is the refusal to give any weight to external circumstances. Peace of mind, he affirms, is independent from one’s circumstances. The fact that we endure poverty, criticism, discrimination or illness should not prevent us from attaining tranquillity.
Seneca employs his flawed logic repeatedly in his Letters to Lucilius. His 24th Letter is praising Socrates (470-399 BC) for his wisdom in facing a death sentence. Seneca is drawing the conclusion that humans have the ability to maintain their peace of mind even in the face of extreme calamities.
I find the example of Socrates particularly weak because it overlooks a crucial fact, namely, that Socrates had decided not to seize the opportunity to flee. His passivity and acceptance of the death sentence leads me to think that he was tired of living, not that he was particularly wise.
How can we improve Seneca’s formula for peace of mind? I would start by acknowledging that external circumstances play an important role in our state of mind. People tend to prefer to be wealthy, healthy and loved to being poor, ill, and friendless.
Seneca’s treatise “On the Tranquillity of the Mind” fails to convince the reader of the irrelevance of wealth, health, social success and general well-being.
If the Roman potentate Gaius Maecenas (70-8 BC) had been prone to depression and insomnia, his troubles do not render success and wealth less attractive.
It stands to reason that destitute people tend to suffer from depression and insomnia more often than wealthy people. The fact that Maecenas couldn’t attain peace of mind demonstrates only that wealth won’t automatically lead to emotional balance.
The missing element in Seneca’s advice on tranquillity
Seneca’s prescription for tranquillity would have improved if it had called for doing the best of one’s circumstances, while accepting the ups and downs of life.
His 27th Letter to Lucilius correctly describes wisdom as a process, not as a static trait. The wise person pursues his goals day after day, accepts defeat when it is inevitable, and does not allow setbacks to lead him to despair.
On the other hand, wise individuals look for opportunities to improve their station in life, health and social success. They know that passivity rarely works, and that steady work tends to lead to success and happiness.
Seneca’s fixation on positive and negative outliers weakens his logic, and renders him blind to the truth. His treatise “On the Tranquillity of the Mind” rests on idealised views of human nature, for the good and for the worse.
Neither of them works, and we will be better off if we take action to pursue our dreams day after day. Setbacks and defeats may occur sometime, but they will not prevent us from making better plans next time.
If you are interested in applying rational ideas in all sorts of situations, I recommend my book “Consistency: The key to permanent stress relief.”
Related articles
Seneca on how to live a good life
Seneca: tranquillity in extreme situations
Seneca’s specific advice on tranquillity